The Institute of Precautionary Measures in Criminal Procedure Law and Guarantees of Individual Rights in the Application of Precautionary Measures: Experience of Uzbekistan and Italy

Authors

  • Rasulova Sarvinoz Sobirjon kizi University of World Economy and Diplomacy 2nd year student of the Faculty of “International Law” Author

Keywords:

procedural coercive measures, preventive measures doctrine, restriction of personal liberty, serious evidentiary basis

Abstract

This article analyzes the institution of preventive measures in criminal proceedings from both legal and practical perspectives. It highlights the role of preventive measures in the conduct of criminal justice and their importance in maintaining a balance between individual freedom and public security. A comparative analysis is conducted between the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the “Codice di procedura penale” of the Italian Republic. The study examines the types of preventive measures, their legal grounds, and procedural safeguards, identifying similarities and differences between the two legal systems. Special attention is given to electronic monitoring systems, house arrest, and victim protection mechanisms. The article concludes with proposals for improving the criminal procedural legislation of Uzbekistan

 

References

Downloads

Published

2026-05-09

How to Cite

The Institute of Precautionary Measures in Criminal Procedure Law and Guarantees of Individual Rights in the Application of Precautionary Measures: Experience of Uzbekistan and Italy. (2026). Academicia Review-A Multidisciplinary Online Journal, 2(05), 81-90. http://academicia.org/index.php/journal/article/view/121

Similar Articles

21-23 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.